Skip to main content

Ask Arbury: The Roman Villa in Arbury

E-mail to Arbury Cambridge blog:

Was a Roman villa found at King's Hedges? I recently saw an outside display in North Arbury/King's Hedges Ward called 'The Roman Landscape in King's Hedges' which claims there was one. And is King's Hedges Road Roman? 

We've seen that display. Electoral wards are not historic areas and local historians really do need to be mindful of that fact.

The answer to your question regarding the Roman villa is no. The Roman villa was found on the site of King's Hedges School, which is not part of the historical King's Hedges area. Historically, King's Hedges was an area of fifty eight acres, and is now north of the guided busway. 

'Kinges Headge' was named by local manorial landowners the Brackyn family, first appearing in print in 1588. The name points to the royal hedged hunting warren, used to trap and kill animals for 'sport' in the days of the old Royal Manor of Chesterton. These were the 'King's Hedges' and the king would watch the sport from his royal box. The 'sporting' use of the site was also current in the early 1800s - with local pugilists slugging it out - for the 'enjoyment' of Town and Gown. 

The Roman villa was discovered not far from the Arbury iron age earthwork, on fields known as the Arbury/Harborough Meadows in the era before Manor Farm. 

The Arbury or Harborough Meadows details superimposed on our 1900 map. The names were a variation on each other, interchangeable, and derived from the earthwork which was a visible landscape feature for over two thousand years. Ring Fort Road at Orchard Park (originally Arbury Park) has preserved the outline of the ancient earthwork.

The fact is, historically the Roman villa had nothing to do with King's Hedges at all, and neither does the site of King's Hedges School.

'Cambridge Evening News', 1969: the Roman villa and much earlier finds in a North Arbury barley field. The road built on the site is called Northfield Avenue. Click on image for readable view.

What is particularly vexing about this is the way planners and local councils ignore the work put in by historian Sallie Purkis and the local community in the early 1980s for Arbury 1980 and the Arbury Is Where We Live! book, and wilfully rewrite history with no regard for that work. If the work had been carried out by people in a more affluent area of the city, we daresay it would still be fawned over to this day - and seen as important. But in an area like Arbury - it seems to be a matter of ignoring the historical truth uncovered by the local (largely working class) community, and forking out for what is actually nonsense - like the display below.

We do hope that we, the public, are not paying for misinformation on outside - or other - displays like this.

The Roman Landscape at "King's Hedges", that towering entity built on council planners' whims, is actually about the Roman landscape elsewhere - namely the old Arbury/Harborough Meadows/Manor Farm, north of Arbury Road.

Of course, the old map doesn't call the area of the Roman villa 'King's Hedges'. We can't imagine why (tongue in cheek).

For your final question, no King's Hedges Road is not Roman. It was originally a farm track, leading to the original King's Hedges (see map at the top of this blog post). The majority of King's Hedges Road dates from the late 1970s, when it was redirected and extended across the old Arbury/Harborough Meadows as part of the Cambridge Northern Bypass/A14 development. The new road actually lopped off the end of the original Arbury Road, and is actually on a totally different course to the original King's Hedges Road.

From 'The Story of Cambridge', Stephanie Boyd, Cambridge University Press, 2005. The Roman villa was found in the old Harborough/Arbury Meadows, now Northfield Avenue, not far from Arbury Camp (see map at top of post) - and was quite luxurious, including a hypocaust (underfloor heating).

As far as we are concerned, the King's Hedges thing is rather a cuckoo in the nest, and shows that council planners have no regard for local history, or the efforts of the public in producing works like Arbury Is Where We Live! The history of King's Hedges should be about the historic King's Hedges, not constantly pinching bits of Arbury. 

If it was King's Hedges it would be, without protest, query, or old maps and documents saying otherwise.

We love to receive your emails, but please remember we are not the only ones producing local history work and we have nothing to do with anybody who proclaims King's Hedges as anything other than King's Hedges. We spend so much time on the subject answering puzzled enquirers, yet we don't even find the history of King's Hedges very appealing. Hedged hunting warrens for royal entertainment and 'sport' and vast 1970s road extensions really do not interest us much.

This is our last word on the subject. We had several emails from readers believing that we, as local historians, wrote it. Please do not blame us for the outdoor display. We had absolutely nothing to do with it.

The majority of King's Hedges Road appeared in the late 1970s, across the old Harborough/Arbury Meadows by the Arbury iron age camp - and lopped off the original end of Arbury Road.


  1. I saw the 'The Roman Landscape in King's Hedges' board on a bike ride. The producers should be really embarrassed. All the old maps show exactly where King's Hedges was and everybody knows about the petrol guzzlers' King's Hedges Road extension in the '70s. Some of these 'researchers' shouldn't be let out, it's misinformation, plain and simple on their part. King's Hedges is such a gut guzzling pig for sucking up other historic areas.

    1. King's Hedges is largely nonsense, sadly.

  2. To make matters worse, a reporter fresh out of University wrote a Cambridge Live article based on that thing!

  3. It's funny calling Arbury Kings Hedges. It's a bit like calling a cat a dog, complete pottiness!

  4. The council need to leave out this Kings Hedges stuff. It's brainwashing and as soon as you take a look through the archives you discover it's poop. The Roman habitation, including this villa, was mainly found near the Arbury Camp and in South Arbury.

  5. The name of King's Hedges School is fine. The only trouble is, it's in an area that historically wasn't King's Hedges and should not be portrayed as if it was. The area by Arbury Camp (North Arbury/King's Hedges Ward) is saturated in references to the earthwork, which is historically of far more note than the acres north of the busway that were the original King's Hedges. If people are to appreciate and identify meaningful with local history it has to be accurate.

  6. Quite frankly my dear who gives a damn? Arbury, like the rest of Cambridge, is filling up with non-thinkers, the type of people who have the attention span of gnats, and like to lecture in a highly priggish manner. I was talking to a man in Arbury Court yesterday who banged on about the climate scenario, while having 4 kids, a car and all mod cons. He cycles to work when the weather is nice because it's his duty to the planet. If the Council told him historic Arbury was Bognor Regis, he'd go along.

  7. King's Hedges was such a grotty insignificant plot. Whatever possessed the planners? Too much booze on public expense accounts I reckon.

  8. I can't get over most of Kings Hedges Road being '70s. I thought it was the decade of green activism and they go and do that! I was talking to a dude who said that Arbury is now much nearer the city centre than when it was built. It isn't. The city boundary is just where it was then.

  9. The Council can call council estates what they want (they do anyway) but rewriting the history of an area is arrogant and misleading. Typical Cambridge City Council.

  10. I don't think most working class people give a fig about the council and its wards or what it calls areas. I live in Chesterton in Laxton Way and to me Arbury starts just past the Golden Hind in Kings Hedges Road. I agree with the point somebody made about Chesterton Community College on here a while back though. I live in Chesterton. That's nearly in Arbury.

  11. What's truly horrible is the gory hunting connections of Kings Hedges. That is revolting.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Main Streets of Arbury: Campkin Road - Part 1

Left: work begins on Campkin Road in 1961. Numbers 1 and 2 Manor Farm Cottages have been demolished, but the intention is to preserve the old trees lining the old Manor Farm Drive. Right: a similar view in more modern times, with the Arbury Town Park and Campkin Road. In 1982, Campkin Road was described as the 'Hauptstrasse of North Arbury' by local journalist Sara Payne. Ms Payne's   Down Your Street  local history articles in the   Cambridge Weekly News   were hugely popular and, for each one, Ms Payne visited a street in Cambridge and talked to the residents, collecting their memories for publication and producing a fascinating series of 'Then and Now' style articles. Down Your Street  followed in the footsteps of a similar series in the local press in the early 1960s - by Erica Dimmock - and both now make fascinating reading. We're starting our look at Campkin Road with material from the 'Arbury 1980' project and accounts from locals contributed to t

What Did The Romans Ever Do for Arbury? Jim Smith

Our trusty old Arbury map showing location details before the Manor Farm was established. The red line, inserted by Jim Smith, indicates the course of the Roman road - Akeman Street or the Mere Way. The land north of Arbury Road was the Arbury or Harborough Meadows, Arbury/Harborough furlongs and Arbury Camp, King's Hedges was in its original position, north of the railway (now guided busway) and Arbury Road ran from the Ely/Milton Road to the Histon/Cambridge Road - as it did until the late 1970s. Introduction - by the Arbury Archivists Jim Smith is a local history researcher and a good friend of the Arbury Cambridge Blog. He has been researching Roman finds in the historic Arbury area and has written this article for us. We are most grateful! He follows the adventures of those who scraped away centuries of soil to reveal ancient findings beneath.  Of course, as always, we deal with historic Arbury here, not council planners' estates or electoral wards, which are both prone to

Exploring The REAL King's Hedges...

The Cambridge and St Ives Branch railway line is now the Guided Busway. Where was King's Hedges historically? How did the name come about? Why is the majority of King's Hedges Road no more historic than late 1970s - and nothing to do with the course of the original road? What have council planners of the 1960s and 1970s and the needs of motorists got to do with the King's Hedges presence in the historic Arbury district? All will be revealed... We're going to leave Arbury briefly and go to King's Hedges. No, not King's Hedges Ward - that area is, in reality, one of the most Arbury of Arbury areas in Cambridge historically, but the REAL King's Hedges. North of the Guided Busway. You see, the land north of Arbury Road is the site of the Arbury Camp, the Arbury/Harborough (a variation on the Arbury name) Meadows and the Arbury fields of Manor Farm.  It has absolutely nothing to do with King's Hedges at all. And King's Hedges was never a district. Land no